We haven't done any surveys of our own, just kept track of the numbers of people and bikes coming through. We occasionally hear nice things from people but don't get reports that our work has really gotten or kept people riding. That would be a good idea to put one out there.

Using bicycling cities like Beijing, Amsterdam, or Copenhagen as references, I might speculate that co-ops as an educational resource might be less needed there because cycling is already so common. Everyone probably either knows basic stuff or knows someone who does. Also, bike shops there are already geared toward bikes as transportation, so it requires of the buyer less knowledge to come across a bike that will serve a bike commuter well. Also, when one is making one's way about a bike metropolis, there are more bike shops and fix-it stations about, so the rider is not so much on their own. Lastly, given the generally sorry state of bicycle infrastructure in most US cities, it is a significant challenge to go carless; bikes are an additional cost and often are treated somewhat as an afterthought in terms of research and budget. All these things point to the importance of community bike shops as a means of disseminating fundamental information throughout a society that is fairly barren in this sense.

I wonder if some of the logic and information used to initially promote bikeshares (before they proved themselves on their own) applies - my understanding is that many people are motivated to use them in large part because they don't have to worry about maintaining them or having them stolen (and because they coincide with improved bike lanes and whatnot). The knowledge shared at bike co-ops can have similar effects in that they make mechanical headaches less likely. Importantly (and perhaps we don't do this enough) bike co-ops can also be a place where people learn how to properly lock up a bike.

There is also the cultural factor of co-ops being community centers and helping bike riders (and especially "bike commuters") not feel peculiar or alone - something tells me I've seen surveys somewhere that indicated this as an element.

-Paul


Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 17:46:27 -0500
From: katharine.d.vogel@gmail.com
To: thethinktank@lists.bikecollectives.org
Subject: Re: [TheThinkTank] Need Statement?

Hi Paul,

Do you do any self assessment or pre/post surveys for Bicycle Tree clients/collective members?  If you have internal data, you should feel free to use that--most funders are happy to see an internally demonstrated need.  Or, better yet, put together a real quick survey monkey (fewer than 10 questions), send it out to directors/point people at a reasonable sample size of co-ops (or just send it out to this list serve and ask a few questions about locale/clients served), and utilize that data. 

Bear in mind that if this is for a small family foundation or a less sophisticated donor that client vignettes illustrating the impact of your mechanical skills training program can also be appropriate.  You're on the right track on wanting to rely on hard data.  Please feel free to contact me off-list at kv@chicagowomenshealthcenter.org to discuss putting together a survey and some other ways to strengthen your needs statement. 

Best,

Katie Vogel
Development and Communications Director
Chicago Women's Health Center

On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 5:00 PM, Paul Nagel <paul@thebicycletree.org> wrote:
Hello,

I'm writing up a Need Statement for our group and am coming up short. Below is the current draft, I'm going to prepare an annotated version as well but that's it at the moment. I'm finding lots of research supporting the need for improved infrastructure, and for cycling safety courses. What I am not finding after poking around a bit is research indicating the need for teaching mechanical skills to riders.

I know from experience that these skills are important to riding with regularity and making bikes a reliable transportation choice. I know from what I've seen and heard that flat tires, bad bikes, and other mechanical woes that can be relieved with basic mechanical knowledge are often a deterrent. But if, for example, you read the US DOT Case Study No. 1 - Reasons Why Bicycling and Walking Are Not Being Used More Extensively as Travel Modes, or the University of British Columbia's Cycling in Cities research, you don't see mechanical concerns anywhere in their studies. I suspect it was not a part of their surveys, and thus not accounted for.

Has anyone prepared a need statement for their mechanical /do-it-together workshops, and found research to support what we have seen to have significant value?

-Paul
The Bicycle Tree
P.O. Box 11293
Santa Ana, CA 92711
http://www.thebicycletree.org
info@thebicycletree.org

Need Statement:
In the United States, less than half of all adults and only 35.8% of high school students get enough aerobic physical activity to improve their health. Less than 2% of Americans cycle daily, and 5.3% ride a bike in a given week, even though 40% of all trips are two miles or less. 71% of Americans say they would like to bicycle more than they do now, and a Rodale Press survey found that 40 percent of those surveyed said they would commute by bike if safe facilities were available.

The impact on health of our transportation choices is further felt in clear ways. Motor vehicle accidents are the leading cause of accidental death in the United States, and the leading cause of death for 15- to 24-year olds. Our transportation system consumes 70% of our crude oil, and is the second leading source of greenhouse gas emissions. The sum total of resources required for roadway, parking, and motor vehicle construction, production, and maintenance is immense.

Changing our cities to move forward from older patterns requires community effort. A review of 139 studies concluded that substantial increases in bicycling require an integrated package of numerous interventions, including bike-specific infrastructure and pro-bicycle programs, as well as supportive land use planning.

The Bicycle Tree exists to support bicyclists and create healthy bicycle-friendly communities through activities, advocacy and education. We take a variety of approaches, including engaging with decision-makers, involving the public in transportation planning, teaching bicycle safety and maintenance, and leading community bike rides, to bring about this much-needed change to the places where we live.



_______________________________________________
Thethinktank mailing list
Thethinktank@lists.bikecollectives.org
To unsubscribe, send a blank email to TheThinkTank-leave@bikecollectives.org
To manage your subscription, plase visit:
http://lists.bikecollectives.org/listinfo.cgi/thethinktank-bikecollectives.org



_______________________________________________ Thethinktank mailing list Thethinktank@lists.bikecollectives.org To unsubscribe, send a blank email to TheThinkTank-leave@bikecollectives.org To manage your subscription, plase visit: http://lists.bikecollectives.org/listinfo.cgi/thethinktank-bikecollectives.org