I agree that trademarking a name that is used by so many not-for-profits is a little unsettling. I know nothing about lawsuits (or the law, really) but i do find this trademark offensive. <br><br>danielle<br>reCycles bike coOp<br>Arkansas<br><br><b><i>Erik Ryberg &lt;ryberg@seanet.com&gt;</i></b> wrote:<blockquote class="replbq" style="border-left: 2px solid rgb(16, 16, 255); margin-left: 5px; padding-left: 5px;"> <br>&gt;&gt; you're an attorney at law...let's do it.  what do we win?<br>&gt;&gt;<br><br>Well, all we win is the right to keep calling our build a bike classes <br>"build a bike classes" without fear of lawsuits and threatening cease <br>and desist letters from attorneys for the corporate team-building industry.<br><br>I should think that would be worth something, though.<br><br>-- <br>Erik B. Ryberg<br>Attorney at Law<br>445 West Simpson Street<br>Tucson, AZ 85701<br>(520) 622-3333<br>_______________________________________________<br>Thethinktank mailing
 list<br>Thethinktank@bikecollectives.org<br>http://lists.bikecollectives.org/listinfo.cgi/thethinktank-bikecollectives.org<br></blockquote><br><p>&#32;

      <hr size=1>Never miss a thing.  <a href="http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=51438/*http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs"> Make Yahoo your homepage.</a>