When you say "no supporting infrastructure," do you mean the town itself or the bicycles?  I would be more concerned about bikes falling into disrepair than the town being bike/ped unfriendly.   IF there's the willpower to maintain those bikes, people will ride them. If people ride them, that's a first step on the road to making your town more safe for people who are riding bikes. Safety in numbers.  Demand for a safer physical infrastructure can follow. 

Local, struggling bike businesses benefit, because the more bikes there are on the road, the more it is perceived as a place where people can ride bicycles. The bike businesses stand to benefit from a bicycle revival. A renewed interest in riding bicycles is a win for them.

On Apr 9, 2015 8:39 AM, "Beth Barnes" <islow4bikes@gmail.com> wrote:
Could you weigh in, please. We have a small, remote rural town with no real bike/Ped infrastructure...yet. A group wants to introduce about 100 used bikes for people to use for free in an already ailing, small downtown. Free bikes? What will that do to local, struggling bike businesses? Bikes but no supporting infrastructure? Thank you for your thoughts. Makes little sense to me.
Beth




____________________________________

The ThinkTank mailing List
<a href="http://lists.bikecollectives.org/options.cgi/thethinktank-bikecollectives.org">Unsubscribe from this list</a>