Re: [TheThinkTank] Structuring beginner mechanics classes
Don't go by the book! What if author screwed up? Learn to think - Go by what makes sense!
I prefer training folks one component per session so they quickly develop proficiency and feel confident in at least one area so they can make a contribution quickly. Training is done on the donated bikes which we need to refurbish anyways so I find it very practical and much simpler then demonstrating how several components work in one session.
On Friday, February 5, 2016, jeffrey@jeffreytong.com < jeffrey@jeffreytong.com> wrote:
Don't go by the book! What if author screwed up? Learn to think - Go by what makes sense!
You can also check out our similar (4 x 2 hour) intro mechanics workshop series here: http://bikecoop.ca/programs/workshops/
It also goes roughly by component -- 1. basics/flats/overview, 2. bearings, 3. brakes and truing, 4. drivetrain.
On 5 February 2016 at 13:03, Bayley Vanderpoel bayley.vanderpoel@velocitycoop.org wrote:
I prefer training folks one component per session so they quickly develop proficiency and feel confident in at least one area so they can make a contribution quickly. Training is done on the donated bikes which we need to refurbish anyways so I find it very practical and much simpler then demonstrating how several components work in one session.
On Friday, February 5, 2016, jeffrey@jeffreytong.com jeffrey@jeffreytong.com wrote:
Don't go by the book! What if author screwed up? Learn to think - Go by what makes sense!
The ThinkTank mailing List <a href="http://lists.bikecollectives.org/options.cgi/thethinktank-bikecollectives.org">Unsubscribe from this list</a>
We teach our courses systemically, and based on the most urgent/basic needs of beginners.
I always start with naming parts and systems, and proper tool use.
- Wheels - hubs, dish, true, flat fix. We specifically teach hub
overhauls first to lay the groundwork for other bearing systems (BB, HS) 2) Brakes 3) Shifting, BB, and Drivetrain maintenance 4) Headsets + Personal time
In every class, I start by letting people know that they will probably remember some, but not all details, and that it will take practice for most people to embed new learning. I start every topic with how to identify and diagnose problems in specific systems, usually by asking the class things like: How do you know your brakes need work? I stick with the technical basics, and fit in more detailed/specialized info as necessary/requested. I also use a big pad of paper on which we've drawn diagrams, and we used to have some learning tools, like a cross-section of a hub that we cut apart on a bandsaw.
The main thing I try to make sure gets driven home is how to think systematically about a mechanical problem, rather than just how to fix bikes: Identify where the problem is (sound, touch), assess if the component (and all components that work with it) is functioning in good condition, and if so, if it is attached correctly, and if so, if the component is set up to function correctly. Small to big, component to system, every time.
In a beginners class, I feel like if your newb students come away confident in how to fix a flat or change their brake pads and name most bike components accurately, you've done a solid job.
On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 1:03 PM, Bayley Vanderpoel < bayley.vanderpoel@velocitycoop.org> wrote:
I prefer training folks one component per session so they quickly develop proficiency and feel confident in at least one area so they can make a contribution quickly. Training is done on the donated bikes which we need to refurbish anyways so I find it very practical and much simpler then demonstrating how several components work in one session.
On Friday, February 5, 2016, jeffrey@jeffreytong.com < jeffrey@jeffreytong.com> wrote:
Don't go by the book! What if author screwed up? Learn to think - Go by what makes sense!
The ThinkTank mailing List <a href=" http://lists.bikecollectives.org/options.cgi/thethinktank-bikecollectives.org">Unsubscribe from this list</a>
There's also a ton of theoretical resources on the bike bike wiki from workshops past
On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 1:23 PM, Lauren Warbeck lauren.warbeck@gmail.com wrote:
We teach our courses systemically, and based on the most urgent/basic needs of beginners.
I always start with naming parts and systems, and proper tool use.
- Wheels - hubs, dish, true, flat fix. We specifically teach hub
overhauls first to lay the groundwork for other bearing systems (BB, HS) 2) Brakes 3) Shifting, BB, and Drivetrain maintenance 4) Headsets + Personal time
In every class, I start by letting people know that they will probably remember some, but not all details, and that it will take practice for most people to embed new learning. I start every topic with how to identify and diagnose problems in specific systems, usually by asking the class things like: How do you know your brakes need work? I stick with the technical basics, and fit in more detailed/specialized info as necessary/requested. I also use a big pad of paper on which we've drawn diagrams, and we used to have some learning tools, like a cross-section of a hub that we cut apart on a bandsaw.
The main thing I try to make sure gets driven home is how to think systematically about a mechanical problem, rather than just how to fix bikes: Identify where the problem is (sound, touch), assess if the component (and all components that work with it) is functioning in good condition, and if so, if it is attached correctly, and if so, if the component is set up to function correctly. Small to big, component to system, every time.
In a beginners class, I feel like if your newb students come away confident in how to fix a flat or change their brake pads and name most bike components accurately, you've done a solid job.
On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 1:03 PM, Bayley Vanderpoel < bayley.vanderpoel@velocitycoop.org> wrote:
I prefer training folks one component per session so they quickly develop proficiency and feel confident in at least one area so they can make a contribution quickly. Training is done on the donated bikes which we need to refurbish anyways so I find it very practical and much simpler then demonstrating how several components work in one session.
On Friday, February 5, 2016, jeffrey@jeffreytong.com < jeffrey@jeffreytong.com> wrote:
Don't go by the book! What if author screwed up? Learn to think - Go by what makes sense!
The ThinkTank mailing List <a href=" http://lists.bikecollectives.org/options.cgi/thethinktank-bikecollectives.org">Unsubscribe from this list</a>
participants (4)
-
Bayley Vanderpoel -
jeffrey＠jeffreytong.com -
Kieran O'Neill -
Lauren Warbeck