Even if you build new bikes up with free labour the cost of parts
(even at wholesale) will bite you. There's no way you and I could
take a $100 frame and then add everything else and keep it under $200
total.
There's a reason pretty well all bikes are made in Asia, and most
companies that still build in N. America soon start sourcing out over
there when they want to increase production volume, which in turn
helps bring the prices down. Your basic "economy of scale"...
Case in point - those that manufacture recumbent bikes. It's a niche
market, and the prices were very high for many years, because pretty
well all the companies were glorified cottage industries. Everything
cost them more, because they could only order so many parts at once.
Shimano will charge you a lot more per item for a load of 500 rear
derailers than they will for a shipping container with 10,000.
Oh, and let's also factor in the environmental cost of new bikes.
Sure, much less than new cars, but steel tubes and chains and bars
and wheels, and plastic saddles and grips and rubber tires all have
be manufactured, and all of those processes pollute to some degree.
With all of the above, might as well do what most of our shops do -
rebuild old but still functional bikes, no?
Mark Rehder - Director re-Cycles Bicycle Co-op http://re-cycles.ca
On 29-May-08, at 4:09 PM, Michael Wolfe wrote:
I've been pondering the same idea. I'm sure there will be many
disagreements in what is the perfect commuter bike. I've been them
looking at them a lot lately including a very nice three speed at
REI. Of course this is out of the specrtum of the goal but a good
starting point. http://www.rei.com/product/761468Remember the 100 dollar mtn bike frames Nashbar sold a few years
back? I imagine something like that with a basic set of
components. Flat bars. Single chainring., 6-7-8 gears in the
back. 700c 32 tires. all else simple yet functional.hmmm..
On 5/29/08, Sherief sgaber@gmail.com wrote: I'm starting to think
now about what the minimum cost of a new bicycle along the lines
we're talking about would be... It would take some research but
with a decent cheap steel frame, the rest could conceivably fall in
line for around $100-150, could it not? With a little work and
some fine tuning between this think tank, maybe we could get
something rolling and in each of our respective neighborhoods start
actually competing. Thinking about here in Austin, a hopeful
starting point is that we're better positioned (geographically and
in the community) than any walmart to offer or promote such a
bicycle to people who need bicycles.What about build kits even, along the lines of ronald's comment?
Save on the labor-intensivity of this kind of project on one hand,
and offer people a discount for building up their own new bike,
helping them along the way and teaching them the repair skills they
should know for their new bike?On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 2:40 PM, ronald ferrucci
ronald.ferrucci@gmail.com wrote: Agreed. I actually meant road bike, it is 9:30 pm here in italy and I have been drinking. Also, my fingers sometimes make decisions my mind is not aware of.I do not think most people need all the gears. When I ride around in the city I use my fixed gear, because really that it all I need. Never had a problem. when I go for longer rides, I take my road bike, because I may like to be able to shift into lower gears for wind or hills or higher gears for straights and particularly downhills. Of course I am talking in the past tense, since I only have the one geared bike in italia.
Again, I think bike collectives can be useful because people can get an actual good bike used for less than the cost of a cheap crappy bike at wal-mart, and they can learn how to maintain them and therefore also save on expenses in the long run.
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 9:25 PM, Erik Ryberg ryberg@seanet.com
wrote:Single-speed bikes are real bikes. Like any tool there are all
kinds of
trade-offs to be made. Brakes cost money, require maintenance,
and weigh
something, but on the other hand they are needed if you want to
survive the
ride, so most people opt to carry a set. Gears have all the same disadvantages and if you live in a flat place and all your riding
is done
for straightforward utilitarian purposes, then it might make
sense to stick
with a single speed. There's no need to tell a person that they
don't have
the sense of a child, or that they are ridiculous, or that they
are not even
an ordinary person just because they prefer a single speed.
I just wish there was a way to give the bike-criminals over at
Wal Mart a
bit of real competition, at least in a small way, with new bikes
that
actually work and that still only cost what the Magnas do. -Erik
ronald ferrucci wrote:
If they get to the point where they need and understand the gears, I think they
will
realize it is time to upgrade to a real bike.
Thethinktank mailing list Thethinktank@bikecollectives.org http://lists.bikecollectives.org/listinfo.cgi/thethinktank- bikecollectives.org
Thethinktank mailing list Thethinktank@bikecollectives.org http://lists.bikecollectives.org/listinfo.cgi/thethinktank- bikecollectives.org
Thethinktank mailing list Thethinktank@bikecollectives.org http://lists.bikecollectives.org/listinfo.cgi/thethinktank- bikecollectives.org